If there's one feature that's generating buzz in the SQL Server community right now, it's Parameter Sensitive Plan (PSP) Optimization in SQL Server 2022. For trading systems where query performance can directly impact P&L, this intelligent query processing enhancement tackles one of the most persistent performance headaches: parameter sniffing problems.
The Parameter Sniffing Problem in Trading Systems
Parameter sniffing occurs when SQL Server creates an execution plan based on the first set of parameters passed to a stored procedure, then reuses that plan for all subsequent executions. In trading systems, this would be particularly problematic.
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.usp_GetTradesBySymbol (@Symbol VARCHAR(10),@StartDate DATETIME)ASSELECTTradeID,Symbol,Price,Volume,Side,TradeDateFROM dbo.TradesWHERE Symbol = @SymbolAND TradeDate >= @StartDate
When this procedure is first called with a highly liquid symbol like 'SPY' (millions of trades), SQL Server might choose a parallel scan. But when later called with an illiquid symbol like 'XYZ' (hundreds of trades), that same plan is inefficient.
How PSP Optimization Works
SQL Server 2022's PSP Optimization automatically detects when different parameter values would benefit from different execution plans. It creates multiple plan variants based on the statistics histogram, essentially solving the 'one plan fits all' problem.
Before PSP (SQL Server 2019 and earlier):
-- First execution with high-volume symbolEXEC GetTradesBySymbol @Symbol = 'AAPL', @StartDate = '2024-01-01'
-- Subsequent execution with low-volume symbolEXEC GetTradesBySymbol @Symbol = 'ZZZZ', @StartDate = '2024-01-01'
That 1st call creates a plan optimized for millions of rows, and that 2nd call reuses the exact same plan - terribly inefficient!
- Another for low-cardinality symbols (index seek + lookup)
- Possibly others based on your data distribution
To identify PSP Opportunities in your trading database, look for these patterns in your trading system queries:
-- Find procedures with high variance in execution statsSELECTp.name as ProcedureName,s.execution_count,s.total_logical_reads / s.execution_count AS AvgReads,s.min_logical_reads,s.max_logical_reads,CAST(s.max_logical_reads as FLOAT) / NULLIF(s.min_logical_reads, 0) AS VarianceRatioFROM sys.dm_exec_procedure_stats s JOIN sys.procedures pON s.object_id = p.object_idWHERE s.max_logical_reads > s.min_logical_reads * 10 -- high varianceORDER BY VarianceRatio DESC
Real-World Trading System Example
Consider this portfolio valuation query that suffers from parameter sniffing:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.usp_GetPortfolioPositions (@AccountID INT,@AsOfDate DATETIME)ASSELECTt.Symbol,SUM(CASE WHEN Side = 'BUY' THEN Quantity ELSE -Quantity END) AS NetPosition,AVG(CASE WHEN Side = 'BUY' THEN Price * Quantity ELSE 0 END) /NULLIF(SUM(CASE WHEN Side = 'BUY' THEN Quantity ELSE 0 END), 0) AS AvgCost,s.LastPrice,(s.LastPrice - AVG(CASE WHEN Side = 'BUY' THEN Price ELSE 0 END)) *SUM(CASE WHEN Side = 'BUY' THEN Quantity ELSE -Quantity END) AS UnrealizedPnLFROM dbo.Trades t JOIN Securities sON t.Symbol = s.SymbolWHERE t.AccountID = @AccountIDAND t.TradeDate <= @AsOfDateGROUP BY t.Symbol, s.LastPriceHAVING SUM(CASE WHEN Side = 'BUY' THEN Quantity ELSE -Quantity END) <> 0
Institutional accounts might have thousands of positions, while retail accounts have just a few. The PSP Optimization automatically handles both scenarios efficiently -- without you!
Enabling and Monitoring PSP
-- Enable at Database LevelALTER DATABASE TradingDBSET PARAMETER_SENSITIVE_PLAN_OPTIMIZATION = ON
-- Check which of your queries are using PSPSELECTqp.query_id,qt.query_sql_text,qp.plan_id,qp.query_plan,rs.count_executions,rs.avg_duration / 1000.0 as avg_duration_ms,rs.avg_logical_io_readsFROM sys.query_store_query_text qt JOIN sys.query_store_query qON qt.query_text_id = q.query_text_id JOIN sys.query_store_plan qpON q.query_id = qp.query_id JOIN sys.query_store_runtime_stats rsON qp.plan_id = rs.plan_idWHERE qp.query_plan LIKE '%ParameterSensitivePlan%'ORDER BY rs.count_executions DESC
- Test with production-like data - trading data has unique distribution patterns
- Monitor plan cache for dispatcher stubs and variant plans
- Consider combining with other features like Memory Grant Feedback and
- Watch for increased plan cache memory usage with multiple variants
When PSP Might Not Help
- Queries already using OPTION (RECOMPILE)
- Procedures with complex branching logic
- Queries where data distribution doesn't vary significantly
- Systems already using plan guides or forced plans effectively
No comments:
Post a Comment